People in their 70s often do things that look fearless. They climb a ladder to fix a gutter. They tell a story that makes a room hush. They step onto a bus alone at dusk. To the casual observer this looks like courage plain and simple. But it is messier than that. In many cases the outward bravado is a quiet strategy. Psychologists have a name for what it resembles. It is exposure in disguise.
What we mean by exposure in disguise
Exposure in disguise is not a clinical label you will find in a DSM chapter. It is an observational phrase that captures when older people deliberately reframe a fearful scene so that they can move through it. Instead of saying I will sit with my fear until it dissolves they do the thing that contains the fear. They board the ferry with shaking hands. They start the conversation about money or mortality. The act itself serves as a slow rehearsal of familiarity. The purpose is not heroic impact. The purpose is to shrink the lurking anxiety to a size they can live with.
A different economy of risk
By their seventies many people have a different calculus. Opportunities to practise emotional restraint and small scale exposure have accumulated. The result is an economy of risk where cheap acts of bravery are spent sparingly and with clear intent. This looks performative from the outside but it is rarely a show. It is a lived technique. An 18 year old who leaps into the unknown for novelty alone is not doing the same thing as a 74 year old who chooses to have the difficult conversation because not saying it would feel like theft from the people they love.
Not denial. Not indifference. Not a costume.
Observe closely and you will see hesitation between the steps. There is often a rehearsal. The voice tightens then steadies. The hands find a reliable rhythm. None of this fits the tidy narrative of fearless elders who have shrugged off fear entirely. They are not oblivious. They are strategic. They have learned the small rituals that convert dread into manageable action. A lot of that is learning to tolerate the unpleasantness rather than being hypnotised by it.
Why the seventies are a crucible for this habit
One reason is time perspective. Time matters because it changes what we value doing with the hours left. Laura L Carstensen Professor of Psychology and Director of the Stanford Center on Longevity at Stanford University put this plainly when she wrote I maintain that the subjective sense of remaining time has profound effects on basic human processes including motivation cognition and emotion. This idea explains why older people often prioritise actions that create meaning and emotional stability. When danger and dread feel proximal there is less patience for abstract avoidance. There is more appetite for closing the loop.
Another reason is experience. Fear encountered and survived becomes a kind of local knowledge. If you have walked through a dozen awkward goodbyes you learn which phrases lessen the sting. If you have fumbled a hundred social calls you discover the gestures that anchor goodwill. That repository is not a textbook. It is a set of practiced moves that can look like confidence but are mostly muscle memory for navigating uncertainty.
The social contract of bravado
Bravery in public has social payoffs. When someone in their seventies demonstrates composure it can alter how others behave toward them. It can calm a child it can reassure a spouse it can reset expectations among neighbours. This is not merely vanity. It is an investment in the social field. By performing steadiness an older person can change the emotional atmosphere of a room and make it safer for everyone else. That is why acts that look theatrical are often deeply relational.
Not all exposure is healthy
There is a shadow side. Some forms of exposure in disguise are actually avoidance with a better wardrobe. Going through the motions of bravery without addressing underlying needs can leave genuine problems untreated. Choosing to face a feared task because you feel you must appear unsinkable is different from choosing it because you have assessed the personal value of doing so. The surface result may be identical. The interior motive matters.
What clinicians see
Gerontologists and therapists describe a pattern where older clients report fewer panic attacks but still feel persistent unease about specific situations. They often use behavioural strategies informally. A retired teacher will volunteer to speak at a school event to reconnect with the community. A widower will join a group of friends to travel again and in doing so will repeatedly expose himself to the unfamiliar until it no longer triggers the same intensity of fear. Exposure in disguise is a slow gradualisation of the feared stimulus until it becomes ordinary.
There is also a moral component. In later life people often frame acts of courage as duties. Saying yes to a once in a lifetime caretaking role or saying the difficult words with a sibling can be framed as obligations and as opportunities. This mixture of duty and practice produces behaviour that is hard to separate into neat categories of brave versus scared.
How this changes the way we talk about fear and aging
We need to stop pretending that observable bravery equals absence of fear. It is more fruitful to ask what function the brave act serves. Is it repair Is it rehearsal Is it boundary setting Is it a ritual? Those answers reveal motive not just temperament. They also shed light on how societies should respond. If bravery is often exposure in disguise then the work we must do is not to eliminate fear but to create contexts where small exposures lead to real containment rather than brittle performance.
Where this idea surprises people
Many assume older people are either stoic or frail. Neither label captures the practical improvisations most people in their seventies use. They look brave because they have refined ways to shrink fear. They remain anxious because life still asks for things that matter. The tension between fear and action sharpens, it does not dissolve. I find that honest and oddly tender. It is not a victory lap. It is an economy of keeping going.
There is no final manual. Some actions will be foolish. Some will be wise. But seeing a pattern helps. Exposure in disguise is a phrase that helps us notice the craft under the surface. It is a reminder that decades of living teach methods that are practical not poetic. If we pay attention we learn from them rather than misreading them as simple bravery.
Summary table
Key idea People in their 70s often perform acts that appear brave because they are using small scalable exposures to reduce fear over time.
Why it happens A shifting time perspective greater experience and social incentives create a different risk economy.
How it looks Hesitation followed by deliberate action. Rehearsal routines. Socially targeted acts that change the atmosphere around them.
When it fails When performance replaces honest engagement and underlying needs remain unaddressed.
What to watch for Motive the presence of rehearsal and whether the act leads to durable change or temporary relief.
Frequently asked questions
Why do older people sometimes seem less afraid than younger people even when the threat is the same?
Older adults often process emotional information differently. Their priorities are shaped by an altered sense of the future which changes what they pay attention to and remember. This does not mean they feel less fear in every instance. Rather they may choose to focus on different features of a situation and use learnt behavioural responses to manage the anxiety. Experience also gives them a larger catalogue of coping moves which can make their behaviour appear calmer even when the underlying emotion is strong.
Is exposure in disguise the same as exposure therapy?
They are related in principle because both involve encountering feared stimuli to reduce avoidance. But exposure therapy is a targeted clinical technique with controlled repetition and safety planning. Exposure in disguise is an everyday informal strategy. It lacks the structure a therapist might use but it shares the basic mechanism that repeated manageable contact with a fear source reduces its disruptive power.
How can families tell the difference between healthy bravery and harmful performance?
Look at outcome and continuity. Healthy bravery usually brings gradual desensitisation or better problem solving afterwards. Harmful performance tends to demand applause or silence rather than lead to changed routines. Time and follow up are better indicators than a single snapshot.
Does this pattern hold across cultures?
The broad mechanisms of time perspective and accumulated experience are seen in many cultures but the forms of exposure and the social rewards for bravery vary. Cultural expectations about ageing and public composure shape how exposure in disguise is practised and interpreted.
Can learning about this idea change how we interact with older people?
Yes. If we understand that what looks like bravado is often a practical technique for shrinking fear we can respond with less astonishment and more curiosity. We can ask about motive offer support for durable solutions and resist turning small acts of courage into spectacles that reward performance rather than healing.
Quote block below for WordPress insertion.
“I maintain that the subjective sense of remaining time has profound effects on basic human processes including motivation cognition and emotion.” Laura L Carstensen Professor of Psychology and Director of the Stanford Center on Longevity Stanford University.
Final thought. There is a quiet craft to getting on with life when fear remains. Calling it exposure in disguise does not sentimentalise the struggle. It names a practical pattern. It lets us learn from it and it lets us be less surprised when the brave are still afraid.
