There is a persistent industry around making people feel they need constant pep talks daily hour by hour. It works brilliantly for apps and newsletters but not for everyone. Particularly not for many of us who arrived in the world during the 1960s and 1970s. This piece is not a nostalgic puff or a denial of struggle. It is a case for a quieter, less theatrical engine of action that older cohorts often operate on and that the motivational complex misunderstands.
What the pushy motivational trend misses
When motivational content promises a surge a day to fix productivity it confuses two different things: fuel and wiring. Fuel is that morning TED clip or playlist that flares you up. Wiring is the set of habits values failures and small cumulative choices that actually determine whether you keep working the next day. People born in the 60s and 70s tend to have wiring that does not require daily fuel. They built routines during decades before smartphones and algorithmic attention economies rewired reward systems. That simple historical fact changes how motivation lands.
Hard earned inertia
Inertia here is not a lazy metaphor. It is the muscle memory of having kept at jobs relationships and projects through messy real world friction. Many people from those decades remember changing careers midlife rebuilding after an economic downturn or raising children without a constant chorus of validation. That repetition creates a certain calm grit that functions differently from high intensity inspired bursts. It is steadier and more privatized. Does this make them immune to fear procrastination or anxiety? Of course not. It simply makes them less susceptible to the circus of constant external pep.
Experience as internal referee
One of the unsaid gifts older cohorts carry is a slightly sharper internal referee. After decades of trying and failing they have a catalogue of what really matters and what is noise. That catalogue lets them skip elaborate hype and get on with tasks that actually move the needle. They are better at triage. They often ask different first questions than the young motivational consumer. Instead of asking how to feel motivated they ask whether the work is worth doing and whether it will still matter in a year. That is a different orientation entirely and one that trivialises the industry of microinspiration.
Why the age bracket does not need constant motivational scaffolding
Motivational scaffolding is useful when you are building a habit from scratch or when the environment is hostile to sustained attention. But many people born in the 60s and 70s have already built long arcs and accept that momentum has a lag and a payoff. They are more likely to value continuity over spectacle. And continuity is boring to sell so it gets ignored.
Practical self regulation beats theatrical uplift
People in this group often trust practical rituals rather than performative mood shifts. They use lists calendars rituals of small repetition and an eye for the long term. Far from being stale these practices are economical and forgiving. They require fewer hits of dopamine and more tolerance for delay. The generation is comfortable with deferred gratification not as moral posturing but as simple resource management. That distinction matters. It is efficient and it is less vulnerable to the attention economy.
Trust in competence not constant cheerleading
Another reason many do not chase eternal motivation is competency. After years of doing things imperfectly people learn the difference between confidence and hallucinated certainty. Competence breeds a reserved boldness. It looks like calm action. It looks unimpressed with hype. And that can appear like indifference from the outside. But it is not. It is an internal signal that says the work will take care of itself if you keep showing up.
Grit is passion and perseverance for very long term goals. Grit is having stamina. Grit is sticking with your future day in day out not just for the week
Author
