Something odd happens when you spend time with people who were children or teenagers in the 1960s and 1970s. They will say blunt things about risk and repair. They will confess small defeats with a sort of weary amusement. They will, more often than not, keep calm while chaos carries on around them. It is not sentimentality. It is a set of mental habits born from an era that expected less pampering and more improvisation.
Not nostalgia. Not a list. A way of thinking.
I do not mean to romanticise an imperfect past. The 60s and 70s were riven with economic jolts and social upheaval and they also produced stubborn inequalities. Yet growing up in those decades left people with habits of mind that look strikingly useful now. These are not formal skills you learned in a classroom. They are rough edges of experience that hardened into durable tendencies. Call them disposition not doctrine.
How accidental training beats neat courses
When you read most lifestyle pieces about resilience you get tidy lists and cheerful exercises. The strengths I am talking about are not curated. They were acquired by default. For people who grew up in the 60s and 70s scarcity, fewer safety nets and a cultural tolerance for non linear lives acted like a relentless coach. Tasks were shared across ages. You fixed things because you had to. You learned to estimate risk because institutions were not always a cushion. This daily improvisation became a cognitive grammar.
Five mental tendencies that feel quieter but last longer
Here I will name tendencies because names help us notice patterns. These are not exhaustive rules. They are habits I have watched surface in kitchens public houses and community halls.
1. A practical optimism
People from those decades are not Pollyannaish. Their optimism is procedural. They expect trouble but assume most problems can be managed with tools time or community. This is different from today’s optimism programmes which often feel like pep talks. This is hands on and a little sceptical—more about methods than mantras.
2. Tactical humility
They will underplay victories because they have seen systems flip and fashions reverse. That underplaying is useful. It keeps decisions grounded and curiosity alive. It also reduces the quick escalation of pride which can blind the next sensible move.
3. Slow reactivity
Not every shock is met with immediate performance. There is a world of difference between pausing because you are unsure and pausing because you assume you can return later and do it better. The latter is common among those who grew up in lean times where delaying a decision until you had more information was a survival tacit rule.
4. Resource creativity
Call it frugality if you must. It is more than that. It is lateral problem solving under constrained supplies. People in this cohort became fluent at repurposing leftover materials and social capital. Today the same pattern becomes innovation not out of ideology but out of habit.
5. Adaptive narrative
Stories from that period often center on pivot and patch. The narrative they use about themselves is elastic. That makes identity less brittle and allows for midlife reinvention without dramatic self recrimination. You are more likely to hear a line like I changed jobs three times because the cost of reinvention was assumed rather than feared.
Why these strengths do not show up on neat psychometric tests
There is a structural mismatch between lived adaptability and standardised measurement. Tests favour clear quantifiable outputs. The strengths produced by a patchwork childhood show in context dependent moves not raw scores. If a researcher orders a battery of lab tests they might miss the quiet mental habit of waiting for better information or the knack for converting social goodwill into practical outcome. That is where lived experience outperforms laboratory neatness.
Grit is passion and perseverance for very long term goals. Grit is having stamina. Grit is sticking with your future day in day out. Not just for the week
Author
